Luigi Mangione plans to withdraw mental health crisis claims – Jurist.org

Luigi Mangione’s attorneys have withdrawn their plan to allege at trial that he was undergoing a mental health crisis, court filings revealed on Friday. Mangione pleaded not guilty in 2024 to the murder of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
The notice came in a letter that Mangione’s attorneys sent to Justice Gregory Carro of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. In the letter, the defense team withdrew its notice of intent to proffer psychiatric evidence under §250.10 of the state’s Criminal Procedure Law (CPL).
The reversal comes just one day after a pretrial hearing in which Justice Carro disclosed that the defense had filed papers in September 2025 indicating it might offer psychiatric evidence at trial. Under New York’s CPL, a defendant must file a §250.10 notice before introducing such evidence. The specific theory the notice would have supported was “extreme emotional disturbance,” an affirmative defense under state law. Had a jury accepted it, Mangione’s most serious charge could have dropped from second-degree murder to first-degree manslaughter. The former carries a maximum of a life sentence, while the latter has a maximum of 25 years. The defense had indicated it was prepared to argue that Mangione was in acute distress, in part because of his experiences with the health care system, when prosecutors say he shot Thompson.
At the hearing, Mangione’s attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo pushed to keep the psychiatric materials sealed. She argued the defense was “not available federally” and that disclosing it would prejudice his parallel federal case. The defense also conceded that raising a psychiatric defense would require Mangione to admit he committed the act. Rather than produce Mangione’s psychiatric history and the name of their expert, Mangione’s counsel withdrew the notice. Justice Carro then ordered the related transcripts and documents to remain sealed. The move also freed Mangione from any obligation to hand those records over.
Mangione’s lawyers offered no explanation for the change in course. Analyst Richard Schoenstein said the move sidesteps the discovery deadline but “does not entirely foreclose” an, albeit difficult, return to the argument later. Former Manhattan prosecutor Gary Galperin suggested that Mangione may have reconsidered, or that his mental-health expert backed out. The door remains open to revisit the strategy before Mangione’s first trial begins in September.
UK dispatch: Court of Appeal upholds ban on Palestine Action advocacy group
Ghana dispatch: parliament passes anti-LGBTQ+ bill, awaits presidential approval
Who Gets to Belong? Indonesia’s Minority Faiths and the Limits of Legal Protection
The Hermeneutics of Collapse: When Legal Form Outlives Shared Meaning
Disenfranchisement as punishment: Ghana weighs democratic order against an inalienable vote
The Legal Architecture of Reparations: A Conversation with Kwesi Pratt Jnr.
US Supreme Court ruled flag-burning protected by First Amendment
On June 21, 1989, the US Supreme Court ruled that burning the American flag in public to protest government policies is a right protected by the First Amendment. Read Texas v. Johnson. Learn more about the legal aspects of flag desecration from the Free Speech Center.
Founding of Halifax, Nova Scotia sparks Indigenous resistance
On June 21, 1749, British colonists founded the town of Halifax in the province of Nova Scotia. General Edward Cornwallis’s founding of the city sparked resistance from the local Indigenous Mi’kmaq and some French-speaking Acadians in the area. French Catholic Priest Jean-Louis Le Loutre organized Mi’kmaq attacks on the British, which would continue through the French and Indian War. The Mi’kmaq would later sign a series of peace treaties with the British known as the Peace and Friendship Treaties, and the Acadians would be deported from Nova Scotia in 1755. Learn more about Fr. Le Loutre and the history of Halifax.

source