{"id":7760,"date":"2026-04-09T02:31:42","date_gmt":"2026-04-09T02:31:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/globalnewstoday.uk\/index.php\/2026\/04\/09\/preparing-for-the-next-nasa-budget-battle-spacenews\/"},"modified":"2026-04-09T02:31:42","modified_gmt":"2026-04-09T02:31:42","slug":"preparing-for-the-next-nasa-budget-battle-spacenews","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/globalnewstoday.uk\/index.php\/2026\/04\/09\/preparing-for-the-next-nasa-budget-battle-spacenews\/","title":{"rendered":"Preparing for the next NASA budget battle – SpaceNews"},"content":{"rendered":"

SpaceNews<\/a>
\t\t\t\t\tCovering the business and politics of space\t\t\t\t
When Congress passed a fiscal year 2026 \u201cminibus\u201d appropriations bill in January, much of the space community breathed a sigh of relief. Congress had rejected the steep cuts proposed by the Trump administration, including a nearly 25% reduction in the agency\u2019s overall budget and nearly 50% to science. The agency ended up with funding close to its 2025 level.
While NASA avoided the worst of the proposed cuts, it did not escape them entirely. One part of the agency feeling the hurt from the budget is its planetary science program. In addition to Congress\u2019s decision to cancel Mars Sample Return, the program\u2019s overall budget of $2.7 billion in 2025 shrunk by nearly $200 million in 2026.
\u201cWe can\u2019t continue everything from the past,\u201d warned Louise Prockter, director of NASA\u2019s planetary science division, during a town hall at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference March 16. \u201cNot everything can continue forward or continue forward in the same way.\u201d
Sign up for First Up:<\/strong> Get the latest updates on SpaceX, Artemis, NASA and more. From Jeff Foust, First Up is a recap of the day’s space industry news, including civil, commercial, and military space developments.
By submitting this form, you agree to the SpaceNews privacy policy<\/a> and terms and conditions<\/a> and to receive email from us and our partners. You can opt-out at any time.
NASA is still working on an operating plan, detailing how it will implement the budget, so she could not discuss specific missions in jeopardy. She suggested, though, that the future of some extended missions, like some at Mars, might be in question or only be approved for an additional year instead of the usual two or three.
There are also doubts about two missions to Venus, DAVINCI and VERITAS, that NASA is developing, along with its contributions to ESA\u2019s EnVision Venus orbiter. \u201cIt is going to be a challenge to get all three Venus missions to continue,\u201d she cautioned.
Even after that operating plan is approved, there are some worries about additional cuts in the form of impoundment by the administration, after similar efforts elsewhere in the government in 2025. There have already been reports of a delayed release of 2026 funding for the National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
\u201cWhat we saw last year is always going to be a risk,\u201d Jamie Wise, a staff member of the House Appropriations Committee\u2019s commerce, justice and science (CJS) subcommittee, said of impoundment at the Goddard Space Science Symposium March 13. Appropriators, he said, would be \u201cvery vigilant\u201d about any efforts to impound NASA funding.
Even if there are no efforts to change 2026 spending levels, there will be a debate about the fiscal year 2027 budget, yet to be released by the White House. Wise is among those who think the 2027 budget proposal could be a rerun of the 2026 proposal and its steep cuts. [Editor’s note: This column was published in SpaceNews Magazine before the White House released its 2027 budget proposal, which we covered here.<\/a>]<\/strong><\/em>
\u201cI would probably follow the betting and say that \u201927 is going to look like \u201926,\u201d he said.
Some in Congress are trying to get out ahead of potential cuts. A March 13 letter to the leadership of the House CJS appropriations subcommittee, signed by more than 100 members, requested a significant increase in NASA science funding: $9 billion, about a 25% increase from the funding approved for 2026.
That jump, the members wrote, would allow NASA science \u201cto return to the trajectory it was on during the President\u2019s first term, adjusted for inflation.\u201d They also asked appropriators to increase NASA\u2019s overall budget \u201cto adjust for the inflationary pressures affecting the aerospace industry\u201d and avoid having an increase in science come at the expense of other agency programs.
The letter asks appropriators to avoid \u201canother round of wasteful, bureaucratic debate over priorities Congress has already settled\u201d by effectively ignoring whatever 2027 budget the White House proposes for NASA.
\u201cSwift, decisive action on the FY 2027 budget is the most powerful signal Congress can send to ensure that the instability created by the FY26 OMB budget request is not repeated,\u201d they concluded.
With battle lines over NASA spending already being drawn, Wise urged a space industry audience not to put too much weight on the administration\u2019s budget proposal, regardless of what it says and when it comes out.
\u201cThe advice I give people is never get too caught up in what\u2019s in the budget proposal,\u201d he said. \u201cIt is just the beginning of the process.\u201d
This article first appeared in the April 2026 issue of SpaceNews Magazine.<\/em>
\t\t\t\t\t\t\tJeff Foust writes about space policy, commercial space, and related topics for SpaceNews. He earned a Ph.D. in planetary sciences from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a bachelor\u2019s degree with honors in geophysics and planetary science…\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tMore by Jeff Foust\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
all dispatches<\/a> >>
all jobs<\/a> >>
Back to top<\/a>
\t\t\t\t\t<\/strong> \t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\tBy creating a SpaceNews.com account, you acknowledge that you have read our privacy policy and agree to our terms and conditions.<\/a> This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy<\/a> and Terms of Service<\/a> apply.\t\t\t\t\t\t
Register now to get
2 more free articles this month.<\/strong>
You’ll also receive our weekly Editor’s Choice, SpaceNews This Week and Opinions<\/strong> newsletters. Opt-out at any time.
Sign in to an existing account<\/strong><\/a>
Get unlimited access<\/strong> to
SpaceNews.com now.
Subscribe for $25\/month or pay less than $5 per week<\/strong> with an annual subscription.
Cancel anytime. <\/strong>Sales tax may apply. No refunds.<\/em> Terms and conditions apply<\/a>.<\/em>
See all subscription options<\/a><\/strong>
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t