Elections officials on Thursday are scheduled to begin reviewing ballots protested by a top North Carolina lawmaker who is trailing in the primary for this state Senate seat.
Senate leader Phil Berger \u2014 who holds immense power over which bills become law in the state \u2014 trails Rockingham County Sheriff Sam Page by 23 votes out of 26,000 ballots in the race to become the GOP nominee in state Senate District 26, which includes voters in Rockingham and Guilford counties.\u00a0
Other WRAL Top Stories
Berger filed protests over 13 voters in those counties, alleging irregularities over things such as wrong ballots and registration errors. Officials could finish an initial recount and act on Berger\u2019s protests by the end of the day, ending the first phase of what could be a protracted process.\u00a0
Guilford officials, who completed their machine recount Wednesday showing no change in the margin, are scheduled to meet again Thursday to consider a Berger complaint \u2014 known as an election \u201cprotest\u201d \u2014 that eight Guilford voters were wrongly given ballots that didn\u2019t include the GOP primary.
Rockingham elections officials are scheduled to begin a machine recount on Thursday and then consider protests Berger filed regarding five voters. In those cases, Berger alleges that:
Russell Collins of Stoneville is one of the three unaffiliated Rockingham County voters whom Berger seeks to disqualify from the GOP primary. Collins told WRAL that he voted for Page in the state Senate contest.\u00a0
Berger\u2019s campaign alleges that Rockingham election officials violated state law by allowing Collins to participate in the GOP primary after he had already started paperwork to enter the Democratic primary.\u00a0
That shouldn\u2019t matter, Collins told WRAL: \u201cI should be able to vote for who I want to vote for.\u201d\u00a0
Collins suggested that election officials erred in giving him the Democratic ballot.
\u201cI wanted a Republican ballot. Somehow, though, I got the Democratic ballot,\u201d he said.
Recount next steps<\/b>
If the machine recounts don\u2019t change the lead of the race, Berger could still request another \u201chand-to-eye\u201d recount in which officials take a random sampling of 3% of all the ballots cast, review them, and tabulate any differences in the vote count. A hand-recount of every ballot would only occur if the initial recount results in a significant change in the election results.
Berger has indicated that he\u2019s willing to ask for further recounts if his protests and initial recount request don\u2019t yield the result he desires.\u00a0
Recounts and protests rarely change the result of elections. Recounts called for state Supreme Court races in 2020 and 2024 \u2014 involving millions of ballots \u2014 each led to fewer than 23 votes changing. Legal protests filed in the 2024 race also failed to change the outcome.
That\u2019s why Berger also made a special request of the North Carolina State Board of Elections this week, asking the bipartisan body to examine 220 specific ballots from the district that didn\u2019t record votes in his primary. He wants to know if voters skipped some of the races or if some of their votes weren\u2019t recorded due to an error.\u00a0
State elections board members rejected Berger\u2019s request Wednesday, saying they didn\u2019t think they had the legal authority to do what Berger wants, saying they would follow the normal process, the next step of which would be examining the small, random sample.
Page, who has called on Berger to concede, said Berger\u2019s request was an attempt to \u201ccling to power.\u201d Page praised the board\u2019s decision and admonished his procedural request. \u201cThat\u2019s not how elections work in North Carolina \u2014 and the Board made that clear today,\u201d Patrick Sebastian, a Page spokesman, said in a statement.
Berger\u2019s campaign said it was disappointed by the board\u2019s decision. \u201cOur request was very simple: save everyone the time and go ahead and determine voter intent where possible,\u201d said Jonathan Felts, a Berger spokesman.\u00a0
Felts added: \u201cToday’s ruling leaves little recourse for every legal vote being counted other than to seek a hand recount.\u201d
Berger can request a hand recount once election officials in Guilford and Rockingham counties complete their machine recounts, but there\u2019s no guarantee all of the 220 ballots will be examined.\u00a0
WRAL reporters Will Doran and Caroline Yaffa contributed.<\/i><\/p>\n