By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Global News TodayGlobal News TodayGlobal News Today
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Science
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Health
Reading: Client Alert: The Government May Actually Be Here to Help – Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Part VIII – JD Supra
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Global News TodayGlobal News Today
Font ResizerAa
  • World
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Science
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Home
    • Home 1
    • Home 2
    • Home 3
    • Home 4
    • Home 5
  • Demos
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Entertainment
    • World
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Health
  • Bookmarks
  • More Foxiz
    • Sitemap
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Politics

Client Alert: The Government May Actually Be Here to Help – Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Part VIII – JD Supra

Editorial Staff
Last updated: May 21, 2026 6:17 am
Editorial Staff
4 days ago
Share
SHARE

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP
The United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provides a helpful set of questions and answers on its website regarding the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). Professionals should note that this guidance is informal, may be updated or withdrawn, and may differ from state laws. Below, we highlight three questions and answers from the HHS website.
Do the HIPAA Privacy Rule protections apply to the health information of deceased individuals?
Yes, for a period of 50 years following the date of death of the individual. During this period, the Privacy Rule protects the identifiable health information of the deceased individual to the same extent the Rule protects the health information of a living individual. However, in cases where a covered entity maintains a medical records archive or otherwise maintains health or medical records that contain identifiable health information on individuals who have been deceased for more than 50 years, such information is not considered protected health information (PHI) and may be used or disclosed without regard to the Privacy Rule.
Content reviewed last December 28, 2022
Does the HIPAA Privacy Rule permit a covered entity to disclose PHI about a decedent to family members or other persons involved in the care of the decedent?
Yes. The Privacy Rule permits a covered entity to disclose PHI about a decedent to a family member, or other person who was involved in the individual’s health care or payment for care prior to the individual’s death, unless doing so is inconsistent with any prior expressed preference of the deceased individual that is known to the covered entity. This may include, depending on the circumstances, disclosures to spouses, parents, children, domestic partners, other relatives, or friends of the decedent, provided the information disclosed is limited to that which is relevant to the person’s involvement in the decedent’s care or payment for care. See 45 CFR 164.510(b)(5). For example, a covered health care provider could describe the circumstances that led to an individual’s death with the decedent’s sister who is asking about her sibling’s death. In addition, a covered health care provider or pharmacy could disclose billing information or records to a family member of a decedent who is assisting with closing a decedent’s estate. However, in both cases, a provider generally should not share information about past, unrelated medical problems.
Content reviewed last January 9, 2023
Does the HIPAA Privacy Rule require that a health care provider document a patient’s expressed preference not to have the provider discuss the details of her health care with her family?
No. The Privacy Rule does not require that a health care provider document a patient’s expressed preference not to have the provider discuss the details of the patient’s medical conditions or health care with family members of the patient. However, while not required, we expect many providers do so (e.g., by making a note in the patient’s medical file) as a means of ensuring the provider does not later violate the Rule by making such a disclosure. Such notes also would ensure that all current and future members of the workforce who are in a position to make such disclosures are aware of the individual’s objection.
Content reviewed last September 18, 2013
A personal representative may stand in the shoes of a patient and exercise the patient’s HIPAA rights on their behalf, including their right to request access to their medical records. A covered entity must treat an executor, administrator, or other person who has authority to act on behalf of a deceased individual, or of the individual’s estate, as a personal representative with respect to PHI relevant to such representation. See 45 CFR § 164.502(g)(4). However, HIPAA permits a covered entity to disclose PHI about a deceased patient to family members or other persons who were involved in the patient’s health care or payment for care prior to their death but who are not personal representatives, unless disclosing the PHI would be inconsistent with the patient’s known preferences while they were alive. For example, this may include disclosures to the patient’s adult children, provided the information disclosed to the children is limited to that which is relevant to their involvement in the patient’s care or payment for care.
See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.
© Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP
Refine your interests »
Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Back to Top
Explore 2026 Readers’ Choice Awards
Copyright © JD Supra, LLC

source

Tennessee kratom ban legislation advances – Chattanooga Times Free Press
Over 70 Permian Basin leaders advocate for energy policy in Washington D.C. – Permian Proud
Gayle Harrell: A measured approach to vaccine policy in Florida – Florida Politics
2026 Indiana primary day election results – Chicago Tribune
Gov. Polis, please veto House Bill 1210 | FEEDBACK – Colorado Politics
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article US Stock Market: Fed weighs new payment account framework amid crypto push – The Economic Times
Next Article Iran war live: Tehran says no surrender to US, diplomacy ‘wiser’ than war – Al Jazeera
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Science
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Health
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
[mc4wp_form]
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?