UN experts condemn attacks on Sudan healthcare system – Jurist.org

UN experts on Monday decried the ongoing attacks on Sudan’s hospitals and medical personnel, calling on the international community to take concrete action to protect the country’s collapsing health care system.
The UN experts highlighted that systematic attacks on Sudan’s health care system have been ongoing. The attacks persist despite the unanimous adoption of resolution 2286 in 2016, which “strongly condemns attacks on medical facilities, personnel, and transport.”  The experts suggest that the worsening situation is a consequence of the international community’s inaction to ensure accountability and compliance with international law.
In April, the UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Sudan, Denise Brown, commented on the international community’s inaction and the role this has played in Sudan’s humanitarian crisis. She called the situation  “an abandoned crisis.”
The World Health Organization reports 217 attacks on health care infrastructure and workers in Sudan since 15, April 2025. Most recently, the March 20 attack on Al Deain Teaching Hospital resulted in 64 casualties, including 13 children. UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health, Dr. Tlaleng Mofokeng, says that attacks on healthcare facilities “directly undermine the right to health” and “may also amount to international crimes”.
Since the three-year war erupted, Sudan has been facing what the UN calls “the world’s worst humanitarian and displacement crisis.” It reports that roughly 34 million people require humanitarian assistance, with 14 million displaced population and 19 million facing starvation. Worse, 10 million children are deprived of the right to education. The UN also voiced concern that the war in Iran may exacerbate the crisis further, as “half of Sudan’s fertilizer comes from the Gulf.”
The UN experts warned that Sudan’s health system will collapse without action, adding: “protection without accountability remains meaningless.” They called on the international community to uphold their obligations under Resolution 2286 by taking concrete actions to end attacks on healthcare instead of issuing mere condemnations.
ICJ opens oral hearings as Guyana asks court to affirm century-old boundary with Venezuela
Romania dispatch: Bucharest meeting marks 12 years of Europe’s cybercrime fight amid rising cyber threats
From Tokyo to The Hague: How a 1946 Tribunal Continues to Shape the Laws of War
The President’s Immunity Is Only as Strong as His Legal Authority
Beaten, Starved, Unbroken: An Interview with Ben Marmarelli, Lawyer to Marwan Barghouti, Palestine’s Nelson Mandela
Blanche v. Lau: Supreme Court to Decide Whether DHS Can Sidestep Deportation Rules for Returning Green Card Holders
Bank of England granted political independence
On May 6, 1997, British Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown announced that the Bank of England would be granted political independence for the first time in the three-hundred year history of the Bank. This policy was statutized in the subsequent Bank of England Act of 1998 gave the Bank independent control of British monetary policy effective June 1, 1998. Read the Bank of England Act of 1998.
Chinese Exclusion Act barred Chinese laborers from US
On May 6, 1882, President Chester A. Arthur signed the Chinese Exclusion Act, barring Chinese laborers from entering the United States and prohibiting courts from bestowing US citizenship on Chinese. Connecticut Senator Joseph Hawley spoke out against the Act in these words: Let the proposed statue be read 100 years hence, dug out of the dust of ages and forgotten as it will be except for a line of sneer by some historian, and ask the young man not well read in the history of this country what was the reason for excluding these men and he would not be able to find it in the law. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and its successors were abolished in 1943 at the insistence of President Franklin Roosevelt.

source